<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q and A: Is Google PageRank Dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ask-kalena.com/seo/q-and-a-is-google-pagerank-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/seo/q-and-a-is-google-pagerank-dead/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Search Engine Advice Column</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian D. H.</title>
		<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/seo/q-and-a-is-google-pagerank-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-465725</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian D. H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 19:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-kalena.com/?p=1741#comment-465725</guid>
		<description>I would most def. not conclude that Google Page Rank is dead. It is also a great tool for marketing ones site to advertisers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would most def. not conclude that Google Page Rank is dead. It is also a great tool for marketing ones site to advertisers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen - Kite Beach Condo</title>
		<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/seo/q-and-a-is-google-pagerank-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-71119</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen - Kite Beach Condo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-kalena.com/?p=1741#comment-71119</guid>
		<description>I agree with Simon... Especially for longtail KWs you can rank high, but hard to move high PR sites, especially fruitless .gov &amp; .edu type.

As to other Authority sites, don&#039;t worry if the domain has millions of links (Squidoo, etc). If the ranked page has no or few inlinks you could outrank it with better onpage and offpage SEO.

What matters too is the PR of the inlinks to a page...
As well as anchor text and the context of the page (to some degree).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Simon&#8230; Especially for longtail KWs you can rank high, but hard to move high PR sites, especially fruitless .gov &amp; .edu type.</p>
<p>As to other Authority sites, don&#8217;t worry if the domain has millions of links (Squidoo, etc). If the ranked page has no or few inlinks you could outrank it with better onpage and offpage SEO.</p>
<p>What matters too is the PR of the inlinks to a page&#8230;<br />
As well as anchor text and the context of the page (to some degree).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Byholm</title>
		<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/seo/q-and-a-is-google-pagerank-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-70505</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Byholm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-kalena.com/?p=1741#comment-70505</guid>
		<description>You can rank with a low PR but it&#039;s a lot easier to rank with a high PR. Analyzing the top ten Google positions for a high competition keyword, like &quot;search engine&quot; will reveal that all of the results have a page rank of 7 or higher. 

Simon Byholm
CEO and founder,
Secret Search Engine Labs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can rank with a low PR but it&#8217;s a lot easier to rank with a high PR. Analyzing the top ten Google positions for a high competition keyword, like &#8220;search engine&#8221; will reveal that all of the results have a page rank of 7 or higher. </p>
<p>Simon Byholm<br />
CEO and founder,<br />
Secret Search Engine Labs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/seo/q-and-a-is-google-pagerank-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-69454</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-kalena.com/?p=1741#comment-69454</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d agree that links remain a vital for rankings.

But I would say that PageRank is pretty much dead.  It&#039;s a poor metric at best because it&#039;s fairly meaningless at the best of times.  Outdated by months, updated rarely and with billions of pages online 1-10 just doesn&#039;t really cut it.  If anything, the total lack of PageRank might be an indication of a problem, but even that can be little more than a guess.  Even then however, I&#039;ve seen pages with no PageRank rank higher in the SERPS than pages with a PageRank of 4 or 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d agree that links remain a vital for rankings.</p>
<p>But I would say that PageRank is pretty much dead.  It&#8217;s a poor metric at best because it&#8217;s fairly meaningless at the best of times.  Outdated by months, updated rarely and with billions of pages online 1-10 just doesn&#8217;t really cut it.  If anything, the total lack of PageRank might be an indication of a problem, but even that can be little more than a guess.  Even then however, I&#8217;ve seen pages with no PageRank rank higher in the SERPS than pages with a PageRank of 4 or 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

