<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q and A: Do search engines index Server Side Includes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ask-kalena.com/seo/q-and-a-do-search-engines-index-server-side-includes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/seo/q-and-a-do-search-engines-index-server-side-includes/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Search Engine Advice Column</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildcat SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/seo/q-and-a-do-search-engines-index-server-side-includes/comment-page-1/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>Wildcat SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-kalena.com/seo/q-and-a-do-search-engines-index-server-side-includes/#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>I am heavily involved in the creation of CMS systems during redesign work in respect of clients taking up my SEO services and use SSI to avoid unnecessary duplication of navigation etc. For me it is an essential part of web design and I have found that there are no penalties for using SSI strategies. I agree with Chris Estes and will add that the output HTML does not exist until the page has been requested by a browser or spider so the chances of the code in raw server side format being read are non-existent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am heavily involved in the creation of CMS systems during redesign work in respect of clients taking up my SEO services and use SSI to avoid unnecessary duplication of navigation etc. For me it is an essential part of web design and I have found that there are no penalties for using SSI strategies. I agree with Chris Estes and will add that the output HTML does not exist until the page has been requested by a browser or spider so the chances of the code in raw server side format being read are non-existent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Estes</title>
		<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/seo/q-and-a-do-search-engines-index-server-side-includes/comment-page-1/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Estes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-kalena.com/seo/q-and-a-do-search-engines-index-server-side-includes/#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>Another way to look at it...  Take the words &quot;Server Side.&quot;  The includes are processed at the server before it is even processed and sent back over the internet.  There are two main aspects of the process.  Front side (the actual final output in the browser)  and back side (what happens at the server).  

So...  Yes,  server side includes are indexed because they are in the final output.  This comment is included with a Server Side Include.  

No, they will not index the included file itself.  You can  even make sure aren&#039;t included by using the robots.txt file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another way to look at it&#8230;  Take the words &#8220;Server Side.&#8221;  The includes are processed at the server before it is even processed and sent back over the internet.  There are two main aspects of the process.  Front side (the actual final output in the browser)  and back side (what happens at the server).  </p>
<p>So&#8230;  Yes,  server side includes are indexed because they are in the final output.  This comment is included with a Server Side Include.  </p>
<p>No, they will not index the included file itself.  You can  even make sure aren&#8217;t included by using the robots.txt file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

