<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q and A: Why is Google indexing 2 different pages as the same ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ask-kalena.com/q-and-a/why-is-google-indexing-2-different-pages-as-the-same/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/q-and-a/why-is-google-indexing-2-different-pages-as-the-same/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Search Engine Advice Column</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webconsulting</title>
		<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/q-and-a/why-is-google-indexing-2-different-pages-as-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-22867</link>
		<dc:creator>Webconsulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 23:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-kalena.com/?p=813#comment-22867</guid>
		<description>I agree g1smd - the canonical form should not include a file path - however, a problem still arises when site owners (or developers) create different pages, with different content for more than one of the widely recognised &quot;home pages&quot; - and then link to them internally.

It shouldn&#039;t be an issue if internal links are consistent, as the server should also default to the same &quot;home&quot; page - but it&#039;s just not very clever to create different pages for more than one of the pages listed above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree g1smd &#8211; the canonical form should not include a file path &#8211; however, a problem still arises when site owners (or developers) create different pages, with different content for more than one of the widely recognised &#8220;home pages&#8221; &#8211; and then link to them internally.</p>
<p>It shouldn&#8217;t be an issue if internal links are consistent, as the server should also default to the same &#8220;home&#8221; page &#8211; but it&#8217;s just not very clever to create different pages for more than one of the pages listed above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g1smd</title>
		<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/q-and-a/why-is-google-indexing-2-different-pages-as-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-22526</link>
		<dc:creator>g1smd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 22:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-kalena.com/?p=813#comment-22526</guid>
		<description>index.php or index.html ?

Which filename is used inside your server is irrelevant, the canonical URL for the root of your site should be www.example.com/  with no filename mentioned at all.

In fact, any request for any index or default file at any folder depth should be served with a 301 redirect to strip that name off, the new URL ending with a slash.

On Apache, that&#039;s just a couple of lines of code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>index.php or index.html ?</p>
<p>Which filename is used inside your server is irrelevant, the canonical URL for the root of your site should be <a href="http://www.example.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.com/</a>  with no filename mentioned at all.</p>
<p>In fact, any request for any index or default file at any folder depth should be served with a 301 redirect to strip that name off, the new URL ending with a slash.</p>
<p>On Apache, that&#8217;s just a couple of lines of code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert K</title>
		<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/q-and-a/why-is-google-indexing-2-different-pages-as-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-22047</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 07:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-kalena.com/?p=813#comment-22047</guid>
		<description>thanks Andy - very useful information here. I was struggling for a while with my website when the index.php took precedence over the index.html. Now I know why. I&#039;m thinking that perhaps nowadays index.php/html (only one of them) is the right one for the job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Andy &#8211; very useful information here. I was struggling for a while with my website when the index.php took precedence over the index.html. Now I know why. I&#8217;m thinking that perhaps nowadays index.php/html (only one of them) is the right one for the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

