<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q and A: Are Flex (Flash) based websites search engine friendly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ask-kalena.com/q-and-a/q-and-a-are-flex-flash-based-websites-search-engine-friendly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/q-and-a/q-and-a-are-flex-flash-based-websites-search-engine-friendly/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Search Engine Advice Column</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darcy</title>
		<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/q-and-a/q-and-a-are-flex-flash-based-websites-search-engine-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-32165</link>
		<dc:creator>Darcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-kalena.com/?p=930#comment-32165</guid>
		<description>I am definitely agree with webconsulting, because when your sites are fully flash effects, this cannot be easily detected by search
engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am definitely agree with webconsulting, because when your sites are fully flash effects, this cannot be easily detected by search<br />
engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webconsulting</title>
		<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/q-and-a/q-and-a-are-flex-flash-based-websites-search-engine-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-25448</link>
		<dc:creator>Webconsulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-kalena.com/?p=930#comment-25448</guid>
		<description>Thanks Saurev, despite recent suggestions that the search engines are getting better at crawling flash based sites - I am still sceptical.
I am yet to see a fully flash site that achieves good rankings for anything - and even assuming that it&#039;s contents IS able to be crawled properly - it is impossible for the search results to link direct to the relevant content.  There is still only 1 URL available to link to, and visitors then have to try and find there way (via the onsite navigation) to the specific content that is of interest to them.  Flash is certainly sexy and can be useful, but should be used as elements on a page (whcih can then be crawled/indexed), not as a whole site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Saurev, despite recent suggestions that the search engines are getting better at crawling flash based sites &#8211; I am still sceptical.<br />
I am yet to see a fully flash site that achieves good rankings for anything &#8211; and even assuming that it&#8217;s contents IS able to be crawled properly &#8211; it is impossible for the search results to link direct to the relevant content.  There is still only 1 URL available to link to, and visitors then have to try and find there way (via the onsite navigation) to the specific content that is of interest to them.  Flash is certainly sexy and can be useful, but should be used as elements on a page (whcih can then be crawled/indexed), not as a whole site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertk</title>
		<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/q-and-a/q-and-a-are-flex-flash-based-websites-search-engine-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-25034</link>
		<dc:creator>robertk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-kalena.com/?p=930#comment-25034</guid>
		<description>Very nice post - I have recently made a website completely in flex - I noticed that while the website itself was indexed, the content (as this website used A LOT of php based retirieval) was not indexed as well as I had hoped. Hopefully this will change in the near future but for now I suggest if SEO is your main target - stick with the xhtml.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice post &#8211; I have recently made a website completely in flex &#8211; I noticed that while the website itself was indexed, the content (as this website used A LOT of php based retirieval) was not indexed as well as I had hoped. Hopefully this will change in the near future but for now I suggest if SEO is your main target &#8211; stick with the xhtml.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

