<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q &amp; A: Multiple Meta Description Tags</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ask-kalena.com/meta-tags/q-a-multiple-meta-description-tags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/meta-tags/q-a-multiple-meta-description-tags/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Search Engine Advice Column</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:39:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Saurav Verma</title>
		<link>http://www.ask-kalena.com/meta-tags/q-a-multiple-meta-description-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-74304</link>
		<dc:creator>Saurav Verma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-kalena.com/meta-tags/q-a-multiple-meta-description-tags/#comment-74304</guid>
		<description>A great &#039;to the point&#039; post Nick. I especially like the &quot;compelling call-to-action&quot; part. 

When will people understand that meta description should be treated as an Ad/Sales Copy and not another place to stuff keywords. Off course keywords are important but a well written description can both be compelling and keyword rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great &#8216;to the point&#8217; post Nick. I especially like the &#8220;compelling call-to-action&#8221; part. </p>
<p>When will people understand that meta description should be treated as an Ad/Sales Copy and not another place to stuff keywords. Off course keywords are important but a well written description can both be compelling and keyword rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
