Guy Kawasaki’s latest venture showcases 38 SEO blogs

Guy KawasakiI was somewhat shocked and humbled to see an email arrive in my in-box tonight from none other than Guy Kawasaki. Yes, THAT Guy Kawasaki – the Apple evangelist, entrepreneur, venture capitalist, author and Internet start-up superstar.

Turns out that one of Guy’s companies, Nononina, has launched a new web site called Alltop that acts like a feed aggregator, but displays them on a single web page organized by topic so people can find news from multiple sites at a glance. It kind of reminds me of, but consisting purely of trusted blog and news feeds relating to specific themes.

Guy was emailing me to let me know he had included Ask Kalena as one of the founding topical blogs within the SEO category on Alltop. His email said:

“I am the CEO of a company called Nononina. We recently released a website that is a collection of ‘single-page aggregations’ organized by topics such as Fashion, Celebrities, Sports, Gaming, Macintosh, Science, Green, and Autos. Your feed is at this topic. Here people can find SEO news from dozens of sites, side-by-side, at a glance.

I hope that you will like it and spread the word. We have found that feeds in our topics pick up many readers because few people know about all the sites for any given topic. Thanks! Guy Kawasaki”


I am absolutely floored and humbled to be included. I was also thrilled to see that some of my respected SEO colleagues and Sphinn buddies made the list of 38 too, including:

  • Danny Sullivan and team at Search Engine Land
  • Rand Fishkin and team at SEOmoz
  • Aaron Wall
  • Donna Fontenot
  • Marty Weintraub
  • Barry Schwartz and team at Search Engine Roundtable
  • Loren Baker
  • Bill Slawski
  • Li Evans and team at Search Marketing Gurus
  • Dave Naylor
  • Andy Beal
  • Robert Clough and team at Search Engine Guide
  • Lee Odden
  • Dan Thies
  • Boris Mordkovich and team at Search Marketing Standard

Congrats guys – I think this is going to be big.

Like this post? Why not prove it? Please press the big feed button at the top left.

New SEM Firm Rating Site: Tempting Fate?

Suspicious MindsWhen the guys at Search Marketing Standard magazine emailed me asking for my feedback on a new venture they were about to launch, I was intrigued. Would I review the brand new site and provide my honest feedback? “Sure”, I said, “What’s the concept?”

“Well”, they said, SEMCompare is a ratings and review site covering SEM agencies. The idea behind the site is to encourage clients to submit reviews on any of the SEM agencies they’ve worked with – good and bad.”

“Uh Oh”, I thought and the skepticism started to flow. After a few minutes of browsing the site, my skepticism turned to concern and my opinion of the site was confirmed: Trouble. With a capital T.

You see, back in 2001, Marketing Sherpa published the first issue of their Buyer’s Guide to SEO Firms. They’ve since changed the model, but the launch issue used a rating system where they gave the SEO companies (including my own) a score rating based on client reviews, search rankings achieved and their internal measure of SEO tactics used by the companies. This prompted some legal action by one or more firms reviewed within the Guide. To me, the SEMCompare site sounded like a very similar concept that could have the same disastrous outcome.

The problem with the concept of rating SEM firms is that there are no published search industry standards that SEM agencies are required to meet and no formal accreditation body imposing such standards. There are certainly de facto or unspoken industry standards that are widely accepted as a benchmark, but no governing body yet exists to regulate the implementation of such standards. As such, a site or service that imposes a rating system is by default claiming a standards yardstick by which all SEM firms should be measured – dangerous territory indeed!

Giving consumers the power to anonymously rate SEM firms opens up another can of worms: how to keep the system free of corruption by SEM firms and disgruntled consumers alike? I couldn’t believe my friends at SMS would open themselves up to so much potential grief, so I drafted some questions about the site and sent them off for a response.

Here are my questions and the answers I received from Matt Alland, Business Development Director for SEMCompare:

1) What prompted you to launch such a site?

Thus far, choosing an SEM company has been a confusing process, especially for those who are completely new to search engine marketing. There really hasn’t been a clear way for consumers to accurately review companies. While there have been some basic independent reviews of select SEM firms, there hasn’t been a more widely accepted industry standard. Having talked to a lot of people looking for a better way to find and compare SEM companies, we decided to create SEMCompare, and offer a new much needed service to this industry.

2) How is the site any different to the Better Business Bureau or Consumer Advocacy groups?

In many ways, we function in a similar fashion, but not precisely. While users submitting reviews are able to rank companies, we’re less concerned about the precise numbers, and put more emphasis on the reviews themselves – why a company did or did not work for a certain business or individual. Our goal is to be a launching pad for people starting their search for SEM companies, and a point of research. I don’t think our focus is to try and become a “scam alert” type site – we encourage users to do additional research on their own and look for those warning signs. Rather we hope people will use SEMCompare to find companies that work for their specific needs.

3) How do you prevent conflict of interest issues and manipulation of the system by SEM agencies posing as consumers?

We do a variety of things internally. I can’t mention everything, but we definitely do IP tracking, cookie tracking, and keep close tabs on email addresses, names, and trends in reviews. If we see suspicious spikes or unusual activity we make note of it and may deny posting those highly questionable reviews as a result. We will sometimes contact the reviewer themselves, and we always read over every review before it goes live to the site.

4) How do you protect SEM agencies from consumers who may have an axe to grind with a particular SEM staff member?

Once again, that goes into a lot of the review tracking techniques we use. If certain trends seem suspicious or unusual we take that into account. These are the same kinds of challenges any review site must go through, so luckily there are a lot of resources at our disposal at this point in time to combat deceptive or faulty reviews. And as a final note, we always have a flagging opportunity so people are able to dispute specific reviews deemed unfair. However, the site does not protect companies from bad reviews and it is not our job to take those down just because a company disagrees with it. Our main job is to prevent companies from posting reviews themselves and from reckless individuals looking to disrupt competition with floods of bad reviews.

5) Marketing Sherpa published a Buyer’s Guide to SEM Firms that rated SEM firms and this prompted some legal action by one or more of the firms within the Guide. How do you resolve to avoid similar legal problems?

We don’t review companies at SEMCompare, but rather provide the platform for people to do so. While we try to weed out as many suspicious reviews as we can, at the end of the day we can’t really endorse or condone reviews on the site. We would expect that people will use their own sensibilities, look into the reviews and follow up with companies themselves.

Despite a number of challenges and imperfections that are bound to exist for this type of site, we’re excited to be the first to really take on this concept fully. Ultimately, the benefits of having an industry accepted review site outweigh the challenges that exist. Review sites are pivotal in so many industries now: automobiles, cameras, consumer electronics, as well as industries like web hosting and web design. SEM is certainly a unique industry, but the same core elements of a review site remain the same, and people’s concerns are no different than with any review site that has existed before us.

Ultimately, we’re excited about the opportunity SEMCompare will be able to offer to consumers, giving people a new means to share their experiences and learn more about the differences between companies instead of randomly selecting providers. This is something the industry thus far has not had, and a service like this offers a chance to simplify and standardize the process of comparing the hundreds of companies out there.

Something from the above exchange triggered a huge red flag for me: “At the end of the day we can’t really endorse or condone reviews on the site.” What? So you aren’t endorsing your own site content? Then why bother creating a site around such content at all? Unless the site’s primary goal is to sell magazine advertising to SEM firms with reputations tarnished by bad reviews? Things that make you go hmmmm.

SEMCompare claim to have already received hundreds of reviews with over 150 SEM companies evaluated. Some of the companies reviewed have an already litigious history, which is alarming. Even more concerning is that a few of the negative reviews are for companies that I’m very familiar with and that have excellent and ethical reputations in the industry, making the true motivations of reviewers seem highly suspicious. I can’t help thinking that many of the reviews I read would make legal departments trigger happy.

Here are some sample negative reviews taken from the site yesterday:

“Paid over $19,000 over 9 months and our natural traffic declined by 30%. They setup duplicate pages (static versions of our dynamic content) and we were penalized by Google. “

“They never (not once) delivered on expectations, and most of their deliverables were sub par. I came to find out late in our relationship that they outsourced the majority of work that our company outsourced to them…thus they were nothing more than a parasitic middleman.”

“The only thing they were good at was stealing my money… I think they even got me banned from Google for three months for using black hat techniques.”

“Their sales team was absolutely relentless in trying to get more money from us. Even when I was complaining that deadlines were being missed, they would try to sell me something. There is no way on earth that I’d recommend this company to anyone.”

“In summary, [company name removed] misrepresented their expertise, their technology, and showed no integrity as they breached their contract, refunding nothing to us. I strongly warn anyone and everyone to avoid spending any resources with this organization. Take your money and burn it. You’ll get more satisfaction from that experience than with working with [company name removed] .”

All I can say is OUCH. Maybe the guys will prove me wrong, but it’s my prediction that this time next year the headaches caused by SEMCompare will see it self-implode.

SMX Sydney Pass Winner

SMX SydneyA blog subscriber reminded me today that I was yet to announce the winner of our SMX Sydney pass giveaway competition. Oops! Sorry about that. Totally slipped my mind to make the announcement on 25 March as promised as I was busy preparing for – you guessed it – SMX Sydney!

So without further ado or procrastination, the winner of the free pass to SMX Sydney is none other than…

Jennifer Cluff

To win, Jennifer answered this:

“What question would you like to hear Danny Sullivan ask Google’s Marissa Mayer at the Keynote Conversation on Day 1 of SMX Sydney?”

with this:

“How does Google technically perform censorship?”

CONGRATULATIONS Jennifer. You just scored yourself a Premium Pass to the SMX Sydney conference worth AUD 1,650. I’ll be in touch via email with instructions for accessing your pass. I’ll also be passing this question on to conference organizers to give to Danny Sullivan for the keynote address.

Thanks for the great question and be sure to stop by the Search Engine College booth for a free t-shirt.

Search Industry Job of the Week: Online Marketing Consultant

Job Title: Online Marketing Consultant
Job Reference #: Unknown
Position Type: Freelance Contractor / Telecommute
Name of employer: Blue Comet Cafe
Location: Los Angeles, California
Date Posted: 25 March 2008
Position description:

Blue Comet Cafe are a new and groundbreaking music portal that indentifies on-the-verge recording artists and, by means of the artist’s self produced videos and Blue Comet Cafe’s social networking capability, introduces them to the world. They are looking for a superstar Online Marketing Consultant to develop and execute strategies to drive traffic and generate revenue.

The ideal candidate is a guerilla marketing expert who has been personally involved in successfully launching one or more online music sites. This opportunity would be ideal for someone who is an established freelancer or someone who has outgrown their last situation and are striking out on their own. Blue Comet Cafe could be that first substantial client.


  • Create and execute a marketing plan to quickly generate targeted traffic to website.
  • Develop and manage strategic relationships with appropriate online communities, blogs, forums and other third-party sites for featured placement, content syndication and other traffic generating activities.
  • Cultivate positive business relationships with ad sales partners, media planners and buyers at ad agencies, including: 3rd party networks, ad sales agencies, ad insertion and tracking platform providers to maximize value of our ad inventory.
  • Lead packaging of advertising and aggressively pursue sponsorship opportunities.
  • Develop advertising programs and promotions to attract new advertisers and continuously prospect for new business.
  • Guide search engine optimization effort and work with their SEO consultant to ensure optimal natural search rankings.

Required Experience:

  • A college degree with at least 3 years of experience in Internet Marketing and Advertising Sales.
  • Demonstrated ability to generate traffic and meet marketing goals for online media properties through the effective use of both traditional and viral marketing strategies.
  • Robust base of established relationships at agencies and direct accounts are a must.
  • In-depth knowledge of the online music industry, emerging technology and integration of advertisers online.
  • Ability to thrive in a startup environment.

This is a 1099 independent contractor position. You will be paid a substantial commission based on total site revenue and have an opportunity to grow with them over the long term. If they do well, you will do really well.

Salary range: Unknown
Closing date: Unknown
More info about company from: []
Contact: Send resumes to: info[at]

For more search industry job vacancies visit Search Engine College Jobs Board .

That elusive “Aha!” moment

Have you ever experienced a self-defining moment? Where you realize that the seemingly benign thought that just floated through your mind has the potential to change your life?

Well that happened to me today. I was reading a blog post about the problems that a particular company was having with their online marketing model and thinking about how to apply some of the ideas to my own company, when suddenly one of those concepts came rushing back to me in huge bold flashing font complete with the opening chords of Beethoven’s 5th.

In that one moment of complete clarity, I realized that I had both the solution to a frustrating time-management problem AND a new business model. Eureka! My “Aha” moment has given me renewed enthusiasm for this industry and I can’t wait to get started on the big idea. More details soon!